I-3-5-70.Recommendation to Deny Request for Review of Administrative Law Judge Dismissal

Last Update: 6/25/15 (Transmittal I-3-117)

An Office of Appellate Operations (OAO) analyst will evaluate an administrative law judge (ALJ) dismissal using the instructions in Hearings, Appeals and Litigation Law manual I-3-3-15.

If the OAO analyst recommends that the Appeals Council (AC) deny the request for review, the analyst will include the following in his or her analysis in the Appeals Review Processing System:

  • A brief statement explaining the ALJ's basis for dismissal and why the dismissal was proper;

  • A discussion of any unresolved issue in the case or with the ALJ's order of dismissal; and

  • If the facts support a favorable action had the ALJ not dismissed the request for hearing, a brief statement as to the merits of the case and a recommendation as to whether the AC should assume jurisdiction.


If the ALJ correctly dismissed the request for hearing because the claimant had no right to a hearing (e.g., there had been no reconsideration, the claimant was not a proper party, or the original action was not an initial determination as defined under 20 CFR 404.902 and 416.1402), the analyst will not evaluate the merits of the case.

An ALJ dismissal is final and binding unless it is vacated by the ALJ or the AC. Therefore, if the AC denies review of an ALJ's dismissal, the AC's notice does not include the right to appeal. Therefore, when proposing that the AC deny review of an ALJ dismissal, the analyst will use the DEN 20 denial notice template in the Document Generation System so that the claimant is not mistakenly offered appeal rights.