Effective Date: March 20, 2009
Publication Date: February 18, 2009
Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 31, page 7630
POLICY INTERPRETATION RULING
This SSR consolidates information from our regulations, training materials, and question-and-answer documents about the functional equivalence domain of “Attending and completing tasks.” It also explains our policy about that domain.
Sections 1614(a)(3), 1614(a)(4), and 1614(c) of the Social Security Act, as amended; Regulations No. 4, subpart P, appendix 1; and Regulations No. 16, subpart I, sections 416.902, 416.906, 416.909, 416.923, 416.924, 416.924a, 416.924b, 416.925, 416.926, 416.926a, and 416.994a.
A child who applies for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is “disabled” if the child is not engaged in substantial gainful activity and has a medically determinable physical or mental impairment or combination of impairments that results in "marked and severe functional limitations." 20 CFR 416.906. This means that the impairment(s) must meet or medically equal a listing in the Listing of Impairments (the listings) or functionally equal the listings (also referred to as “functional equivalence”). 20 CFR 416.924 and 416.926a.
As we explain in greater detail in SSR 09-1p, we always evaluate the “whole child” when we make a finding regarding functional equivalence, unless we can otherwise make a fully favorable determination or decision. We focus first on the child’s activities, and evaluate how appropriately, effectively, and independently the child functions compared to children of the same age who do not have impairments. 20 CFR 416.926a(b) and (c). We consider what activities the child cannot do, has difficulty doing, needs help doing, or is restricted from doing because of the impairment(s). 20 CFR 416.926a(a). Activities are everything a child does at home, at school, and in the community, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
We next evaluate the effects of a child’s impairment(s) by rating the degree to which the impairment(s) limits functioning in six “domains.” Domains are broad areas of functioning intended to capture all of what a child can or cannot do. We use the following six domains:
(1) Acquiring and using information,
(2) Attending and completing tasks,
(3) Interacting and relating with others,
(4) Moving about and manipulating objects,
(5) Caring for yourself, and
(6) Health and physical well-being.
20 CFR 416.926a(b)(1).
To functionally equal the listings, an impairment(s) must be of listing-level severity; that is, it must result in "marked" limitations in two domains of functioning or an "extreme" limitation in one domain. 20 CFR 416.926a(a).
In the domain of “Attending and completing tasks,” we consider a child’s ability to focus and maintain attention, and to begin, carry through, and finish activities or tasks. We consider the child’s ability to initiate and maintain attention, including the child’s alertness and ability to focus on an activity or task despite distractions, and to perform tasks at an appropriate pace. We also consider the child’s ability to change focus after completing a task and to avoid impulsive thinking and acting. Finally, we evaluate a child’s ability to organize, plan ahead, prioritize competing tasks, and manage time.
The ability to attend and to complete tasks develops throughout childhood, evolving from an infant’s earliest response to stimuli, such as light, sound, and movement, to an adolescent’s completion of academic requirements. Over time, this evolution can be seen in the steady development of a child’s ability to attend and to complete increasingly complex tasks. For example:
As in any domain, when we evaluate a child’s limitations in the domain of “Attending and completing tasks,” we consider how appropriately, effectively, and independently the child functions compared to children of the same age who do not have impairments. For example, a teacher may report that a child “pays attention well with frequent prompting.” The need for frequent prompting demonstrates that the child is not paying attention as appropriately, effectively, or independently as children of the same age who do not have impairments. Despite the fact that the child is paying attention with prompting, this child is not functioning well in this domain.
The domain of “Attending and completing tasks” covers only the mental aspects of task completion; such as the mental pace that a child can maintain to complete a task. Therefore, limitations in the domain of “Attending and completing tasks” are most often seen in children with mental disorders. For example, in school:
Although we more often see limitations in this domain in connection with mental disorders, a physical impairment(s) can also affect a child’s mental ability to attend and to complete tasks. For example, pain caused by a musculoskeletal disorder can distract a child and interfere with the child’s ability to concentrate and to complete assignments on time. Medications that affect concentration or interfere with other mental processes, such as some medications for seizure disorders, may also affect a child’s ability to attend and to complete tasks.
Some children with impairments can attend to some tasks, but not to all tasks in all settings. Such children may exhibit “hyperfocus,” an intense focus on things that interest them, such as video games, but be limited in their ability to focus on other tasks. These kinds of limitations in the domain of “Attending and completing tasks” are common in children with AD/HD and autistic spectrum disorders (ASD). For example, some children with ASD may be distracted by, or become fixated on, everyday sounds (such as the hum of an air conditioner) that children without impairments can easily ignore. Children with autism may become fixated on parts of an object (such as the wheels on a toy truck) rather than on the more obvious and primary use of the object. Children with Asperger’s disorder (one type of ASD), may hyperfocus on a single area of interest and have difficulty discussing or paying attention to any other subject. These children may appear to function well, or even better than other children, in the area of hyperfocus, but may be very limited in some other tasks and settings.
As with limitations in any domain, we do not consider a limitation in the domain of “Attending and completing tasks” unless it results from a medically determinable impairment(s). However, while it is common for all children to experience some difficulty attending and completing tasks from time to time, a child who has significant but unexplained problems in this domain may have an impairment(s) that was not alleged or has not yet been diagnosed. In such cases, adjudicators should pursue any indications that an impairment(s) may be present.
In the domain of “Attending and completing tasks,” we consider the mental aspects of a child’s ability to focus, maintain attention, and complete age-appropriate tasks throughout the day. In addition, because the ability to attend and to complete tasks is involved in nearly everything a child does, an impairment(s) that affects this ability may cause limitations in other domains.
For example, school-age children with AD/HD may have limitations in multiple domains. The effects of inattention and hyperactivity can impede the learning process and affect competence in many areas of life. These effects can result in limitations in the domain of “Acquiring and using information”; for example, by undermining academic performance. They may also have effects in the domain of “Interacting and relating with others”; for example, children with AD/HD may interrupt others in conversation or have difficulty taking turns during play activities. They may also cause limitations in the domain of “Caring for yourself”; for example, when a child risks personal safety by not stopping and thinking before doing something.
Therefore, as in any case, we evaluate the effects of a child’s impairment(s), including the effects of medication or other treatment and therapies, in all relevant domains. Rating the limitations caused by a child’s impairment(s) in each and every domain that is affected is not “double-weighting” of either the impairment(s) or its effects. Rather, it recognizes the particular effects of the child’s impairment(s) in all domains involved in the child’s limited activities.
While there is a wide range of normal development, most children follow a typical course as they grow and mature. To assist adjudicators in evaluating a child’s impairment-related limitations in the domain of “Attending and completing tasks,” we provide the following examples of typical functioning drawn from our regulations, training, and case reviews. These examples are not all-inclusive, and adjudicators are not required to develop evidence about each of them. They are simply a frame of reference for determining whether children are functioning typically for their age with respect to attending and completing tasks.
To further assist adjudicators in evaluating a child’s impairment-related limitations in the domain of “Attending and completing tasks,” we also provide the following examples of some of the limitations we consider in this domain. These examples are drawn from our regulations and training. They are not the only examples of limitations in this domain, nor do they necessarily describe a “marked” or an “extreme” limitation.
In addition, the examples below may or may not describe limitations depending on the expected level of functioning for a given child’s age. For example, a toddler would not be expected to be able to play a game or stay on another task for an hour, but a teenager would.
This SSR is effective on March 20, 2009.
SSR 09-1p, Title XVI: Determining Childhood Disability Under the Functional Equivalence Rule — The "Whole Child" Approach;SSR 09-2p, Title: Determining Childhood Disability — Documenting a Child's Impairment-Related Limitations; SSR 09-3p, Title XVI: Determining Childhood Disability — The Functional Equivalence Domain of “Acquiring and Using Information”;SSR 09-5p, Title XVI: Determining Childhood Disability — “Interacting and Relating with Others”; SSR 09-6p, Title XVI: Determining Childhood Disability — The Functional Equivalence Domain of “Moving About and Manipulating Objects”; SSR 09-7p, Title XVI: Determining Childhood Disability — The Functional Equivalence Domain of “Caring for Yourself”; SSR 09-8p, Title XVI: Determining Childhood Disability — The Functional Equivalence Domain of “Health and Physical Well-Being”; SSR 98-1p, Title XVI: Determining Medical Equivalence in Childhood Disability Claims When a Child Has Marked Limitations in Cognition and Speech; and Program Operations Manual System (POMS) DI 25225.030, DI 25225.035, DI 25225.040, DI 25225.045, DI 25225.050, and DI 25225.055.
 The definition of disability in section 1614(a)(3)(C) of the Social Security Act (the Act) applies to any “individual” who has not attained age 18. In this SSR, we use the word "child" to refer to any such person, regardless of whether the person is considered a "child" for purposes of the SSI program under section 1614(c) of the Act.
 For simplicity, we refer in this SSR only to initial claims for benefits. However, the policy interpretations in this SSR also apply to continuing disability reviews of children under section 1614(a)(4) of the Act and 20 CFR 416.994a.
 We use the term “impairment(s)” in this SSR to refer to an “impairment or a combination of impairments.”
 The impairment(s) must also satisfy the duration requirement in section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Act; that is, it must be expected to result in death, or must have lasted or be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.
 For each major body system, the listings describe impairments we consider severe enough to cause “marked and severe functional limitations.” 20 CFR 416.925(a); 20 CFR part 404, subpart P, appendix 1.
 See SSR 09-1p, Title XVI: Determining Childhood Disability Under the Functional Equivalence Rule – The “Whole Child” Approach.
 However, some children have chronic physical or mental impairments that are characterized by episodes of exacerbation (worsening) and remission (improvement); therefore, their level of functioning may vary considerably over time. To properly evaluate the severity of a child’s limitations in functioning, as described in the following paragraphs, we must consider any variations in the child’s level of functioning to determine the impact of the chronic illness on the child’s ability to function longitudinally; that is, over time. For more information about how we evaluate the severity of a child’s limitations, see SSR 09-1p. For a comprehensive discussion of how we document a child’s functioning, including evidentiary sources, see SSR 09-2p, Title XVI: Determining Childhood Disability – Documenting a Child’s Impairment-Related Limitations.
 For the first five domains, we describe typical development and functioning using five age categories: Newborns and young infants (birth to attainment of age 1); older infants and toddlers (age 1 to attainment of age 3); preschool children (age 3 to attainment of age 6); school-age children (age 6 to attainment of age 12); and adolescents (age 12 to attainment of age 18). We do not use age categories in the sixth domain because that domain does not address typical development and functioning, as we explain in SSR 09-8p, Title XVI: Determining Childhood Disability – The Functional Equivalence Domain of “Health and Physical Well-Being.”
 See 20 CFR 416.926a(e) for definitions of the terms “marked” and “extreme.”
 In 20 CFR 416.924a(b)(5),
we provide that how independently a child can “initiate, sustain,
and complete” activities is a “factor” we consider
when evaluating a child’s functioning. The difference between
this “factor” and the domain of “Attending and
completing tasks” is that the factor addresses the issue of
independence in functioning at every step in the sequential evaluation
process and in all domains—the extent to which a child can begin,
carry out, and finish age-appropriate activities at an appropriate rate
and without needing extra help. The child may receive help in a number
of ways: Personal service from another person; special equipment,
devices, or medications; adaptations (such as special appliances); and
structured or supportive settings, including the amount of help the
child needs to remain in a regular setting.
The domain of “Attending and completing tasks” assesses a child’s specific ability to focus and maintain attention.
 We evaluate a child’s physical ability to complete tasks in the domain of “Moving about and manipulating objects,” or when appropriate, “Health and physical well-being.” For example, a child who has difficulty getting dressed at an age-appropriate pace because of rheumatoid arthritis has a limitation that we evaluate in the domain of “Moving about and manipulating objects” or “Health and physical well-being” depending on the specific physical reason for the limitation; for example, joint deformity (Moving about and manipulating objects) or constitutional symptoms and signs (Health and physical well-being). A physical impairment may have effects that we evaluate in both the domains of “Moving about and manipulating objects” and “Health and physical well-being”; such as when a child has both a musculoskeletal deformity and constitutional symptoms and signs because of systemic sclerosis. In addition to the SSRs for the other domains cited at the end of this SSR, see generally SSR 09-1p.
 We provide a number of examples involving AD/HD and autism spectrum disorders in this SSR because these impairments frequently occur in childhood SSI cases. However, many other kinds of mental disorders can cause limitations in the ability to attend and to complete tasks. For example, mood disorders, such as depression, often cause difficulties in concentration.
 For more information about how we rate limitations, including their interactive and cumulative effects, see SSR 09-1p.
 See 20 CFR 416.924b.
Back to Table of Contents