Hearing Office Dispositions Per ALJ Per Day Rate Ranking Report
FY 2012 (For Reporting Purposes: 10/01/2011 Through 04/27/2012)
A ranking of the 165 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of
hearings dispositions per ALJ per day. The
average shown will be a combined average
for all ALJs working in that hearing office.
Users will be able determine where a particular
hearing office stands among the total with
respect to this workload category.
This data is also available in XML format by clicking on the XML icon
This data is also available in PDF format by clicking on the PDF icon
National Ranking Report
By ALJ Dispositions Per Day Per ALJ
Fiscal YTD Ending: 04/27/2012
Workdays: 143
|
Rank
|
Hearing Office |
Region
|
ALJ Dispositions
Per Day Per ALJ
|
|
1
|
HONOLULU |
09
|
3.69
|
|
2
|
MAYAGUEZ |
02
|
3.68
|
|
3
|
MCALESTER |
06
|
3.54
|
|
4
|
FARGO |
08
|
3.47
|
|
5
|
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX * |
06
|
3.24
|
|
5
|
ANCHORAGE AK |
10
|
3.24
|
|
7
|
KINGSPORT |
04
|
3.18
|
|
8
|
ALEXANDRIA |
06
|
3.10
|
|
9
|
COLUMBIA MO |
07
|
2.95
|
|
10
|
PROVIDENCE |
01
|
2.94
|
|
11
|
MEMPHIS |
04
|
2.92
|
|
12
|
WILKES BARRE |
03
|
2.89
|
|
12
|
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN |
09
|
2.89
|
|
14
|
JERICHO |
02
|
2.88
|
|
14
|
CHARLESTON WV |
03
|
2.88
|
|
16
|
COLORADO SPRINGS |
08
|
2.87
|
|
17
|
SAN BERNARDINO |
09
|
2.84
|
|
17
|
SHREVEPORT |
06
|
2.84
|
|
19
|
MT PLEASANT MI |
05
|
2.82
|
|
20
|
PONCE |
02
|
2.79
|
|
21
|
LAWRENCE MA |
01
|
2.78
|
|
22
|
FORT WORTH |
06
|
2.76
|
|
23
|
MIDDLESBORO |
04
|
2.74
|
|
24
|
FAYETTEVILLE NC |
04
|
2.71
|
|
25
|
NEW YORK |
02
|
2.69
|
|
26
|
GREENVILLE |
04
|
2.68
|
|
26
|
VALPARAISO IN |
05
|
2.68
|
|
28
|
WICHITA |
07
|
2.67
|
|
28
|
RENO NV |
09
|
2.67
|
|
28
|
LEXINGTON |
04
|
2.67
|
|
31
|
PHILADELPHIA EAST |
03
|
2.66
|
|
31
|
BILLINGS |
08
|
2.66
|
|
33
|
LITTLE ROCK |
06
|
2.64
|
|
33
|
TUCSON |
09
|
2.64
|
|
33
|
SAN RAFAEL |
09
|
2.64
|
|
36
|
TULSA |
06
|
2.63
|
|
36
|
COVINGTON GA |
04
|
2.63
|
|
38
|
JOHNSTOWN |
03
|
2.62
|
|
38
|
HARTFORD |
01
|
2.62
|
|
40
|
FT LAUDERDALE |
04
|
2.60
|
|
40
|
FORT SMITH |
06
|
2.60
|
|
42
|
CHATTANOOGA |
04
|
2.59
|
|
43
|
SPRINGFIELD MA |
01
|
2.58
|
|
43
|
STOCKTON |
09
|
2.58
|
|
43
|
MINNEAPOLIS |
05
|
2.58
|
|
43
|
EUGENE |
10
|
2.58
|
|
47
|
GRAND RAPIDS |
05
|
2.57
|
|
47
|
LIVONIA MI |
05
|
2.57
|
|
47
|
RICHMOND |
03
|
2.57
|
|
47
|
HARRISBURG |
03
|
2.57
|
|
51
|
FORT MYERS FL * |
04
|
2.56
|
|
51
|
LONG BEACH |
09
|
2.56
|
|
51
|
ORANGE |
09
|
2.56
|
|
54
|
SEVEN FIELDS |
03
|
2.55
|
|
55
|
MORGANTOWN |
03
|
2.54
|
|
55
|
CHARLOTTE |
04
|
2.54
|
|
55
|
PADUCAH |
04
|
2.54
|
|
55
|
METAIRIE |
06
|
2.54
|
|
59
|
TOLEDO OH |
05
|
2.52
|
|
59
|
WASHINGTON |
03
|
2.52
|
|
59
|
BOSTON |
01
|
2.52
|
|
62
|
RALEIGH |
04
|
2.51
|
|
62
|
HATTIESBURG |
04
|
2.51
|
|
62
|
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN |
06
|
2.51
|
|
65
|
NASHVILLE |
04
|
2.50
|
|
66
|
MANCHESTER |
01
|
2.49
|
|
67
|
SAN JOSE |
09
|
2.48
|
|
68
|
NORFOLK |
03
|
2.46
|
|
68
|
DALLAS NORTH |
06
|
2.46
|
|
70
|
SAN ANTONIO |
06
|
2.45
|
|
70
|
DALLAS DOWNTOWN |
06
|
2.45
|
|
70
|
HUNTINGTON |
03
|
2.45
|
|
70
|
ROANOKE |
03
|
2.45
|
|
74
|
LOUISVILLE |
04
|
2.44
|
|
74
|
JACKSON |
04
|
2.44
|
|
74
|
SPOKANE |
10
|
2.44
|
|
77
|
FORT WAYNE |
05
|
2.43
|
|
77
|
NEW HAVEN |
01
|
2.43
|
|
79
|
PORTLAND ME |
01
|
2.42
|
|
79
|
COLUMBIA SC |
04
|
2.42
|
|
81
|
MACON |
04
|
2.41
|
|
81
|
NEWARK |
02
|
2.41
|
|
81
|
OAK PARK |
05
|
2.41
|
|
84
|
EVANSVILLE |
05
|
2.40
|
|
84
|
LOS ANGELES WEST |
09
|
2.40
|
|
84
|
OMAHA |
07
|
2.40
|
|
87
|
CREVE COEUR |
07
|
2.38
|
|
88
|
BALTIMORE |
03
|
2.37
|
|
88
|
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN |
04
|
2.37
|
|
88
|
FLORENCE |
04
|
2.37
|
|
88
|
PITTSBURGH |
03
|
2.37
|
|
88
|
MONTGOMERY |
04
|
2.37
|
|
93
|
ROCHESTER * |
02
|
2.35
|
|
93
|
SACRAMENTO |
09
|
2.35
|
|
93
|
SAN FRANCISCO |
09
|
2.35
|
|
96
|
CHARLOTTESVILLE |
03
|
2.34
|
|
96
|
HOUSTON-BISSONNET |
06
|
2.34
|
|
96
|
MADISON |
05
|
2.34
|
|
99
|
AKRON OH |
05
|
2.33
|
|
99
|
SOUTH JERSEY |
02
|
2.33
|
|
101
|
BRONX |
02
|
2.32
|
|
101
|
MORENO VALLEY CA |
09
|
2.32
|
|
103
|
WEST DES MOINES |
07
|
2.31
|
|
103
|
SYRACUSE |
02
|
2.31
|
|
103
|
SAN JUAN |
02
|
2.31
|
|
103
|
BIRMINGHAM |
04
|
2.31
|
|
107
|
TOPEKA KS |
07
|
2.30
|
|
107
|
DAYTON |
05
|
2.30
|
|
107
|
SANTA BARBARA |
09
|
2.30
|
|
110
|
TACOMA WA |
10
|
2.29
|
|
110
|
DENVER |
08
|
2.29
|
|
110
|
TALLAHASSEE FL |
04
|
2.29
|
|
110
|
DOVER |
03
|
2.29
|
|
110
|
BROOKLYN |
02
|
2.29
|
|
115
|
ST PETERSBURG FL |
04
|
2.27
|
|
115
|
MOBILE |
04
|
2.27
|
|
115
|
NEW ORLEANS |
06
|
2.27
|
|
115
|
ORLANDO |
04
|
2.27
|
|
119
|
ELKINS PARK |
03
|
2.26
|
|
119
|
LAS VEGAS |
09
|
2.26
|
|
121
|
TUPELO |
04
|
2.25
|
|
122
|
DETROIT |
05
|
2.24
|
|
122
|
PEORIA |
05
|
2.24
|
|
122
|
SALT LAKE CITY |
08
|
2.24
|
|
122
|
ALBANY |
02
|
2.24
|
|
122
|
ATLANTA NORTH |
04
|
2.24
|
|
122
|
CHARLESTON SC |
04
|
2.24
|
|
128
|
ST LOUIS |
07
|
2.23
|
|
128
|
FLINT |
05
|
2.23
|
|
128
|
PORTLAND OR |
10
|
2.23
|
|
131
|
PHOENIX |
09
|
2.21
|
|
131
|
ALBUQUERQUE |
06
|
2.21
|
|
133
|
ORLAND PARK |
05
|
2.20
|
|
134
|
INDIANAPOLIS |
05
|
2.18
|
|
134
|
SAVANNAH |
04
|
2.18
|
|
136
|
LANSING |
05
|
2.17
|
|
137
|
TAMPA |
04
|
2.16
|
|
138
|
KNOXVILLE |
04
|
2.15
|
|
139
|
JACKSONVILLE |
04
|
2.13
|
|
139
|
PHOENIX NORTH |
09
|
2.13
|
|
141
|
OAK BROOK |
05
|
2.12
|
|
142
|
GREENSBORO |
04
|
2.10
|
|
142
|
SEATTLE |
10
|
2.10
|
|
144
|
EVANSTON |
05
|
2.09
|
|
145
|
OKLAHOMA CITY |
06
|
2.08
|
|
145
|
JERSEY CITY |
02
|
2.08
|
|
147
|
PHILADELPHIA |
03
|
2.07
|
|
148
|
WHITE PLAINS |
02
|
2.05
|
|
148
|
MILWAUKEE |
05
|
2.05
|
|
150
|
FRANKLIN TN |
04
|
2.03
|
|
151
|
KANSAS CITY |
07
|
2.01
|
|
152
|
FRESNO |
09
|
2.00
|
|
152
|
PASADENA |
09
|
2.00
|
|
154
|
DOWNEY |
09
|
1.99
|
|
155
|
SPRINGFIELD MO |
07
|
1.92
|
|
156
|
CLEVELAND |
05
|
1.88
|
|
157
|
SAN DIEGO |
09
|
1.86
|
|
158
|
COLUMBUS |
05
|
1.82
|
|
159
|
CINCINNATI |
05
|
1.81
|
|
160
|
CHICAGO |
05
|
1.80
|
|
161
|
AUGUSTA GA |
04
|
1.78
|
|
162
|
OAKLAND |
09
|
1.76
|
|
163
|
BUFFALO |
02
|
1.68
|
|
164
|
MIAMI |
04
|
1.55
|
|
165
|
QUEENS |
02
|
1.52
|
* Satellite Offices reported separately from their parent office.
Disclaimer: These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.
|