| Skip to content Social Security Online |
Hearings and Appeals | |
| Public Use Files | Public Use Files |
|
Available Data Files
|
Hearing Office Dispositions Per ALJ Per Day Rate Ranking ReportFY 2013 (For Reporting Purposes: 09/29/2012 Through 05/31/2013)A ranking of the 165 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of hearings dispositions per ALJ per day. The average shown will be a combined average for all ALJs working in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category. National Ranking Report
|
| Rank | Hearing Office | Region | ALJ Dispositions Per Day Per ALJ |
|---|---|---|---|
1 |
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX * | 06 |
3.33 |
2 |
KINGSPORT | 04 |
3.16 |
3 |
PONCE | 02 |
3.12 |
4 |
WILKES BARRE | 03 |
2.95 |
5 |
PADUCAH | 04 |
2.84 |
6 |
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN | 09 |
2.75 |
7 |
FARGO | 08 |
2.73 |
8 |
HATTIESBURG | 04 |
2.71 |
9 |
MCALESTER | 06 |
2.69 |
10 |
COLORADO SPRINGS | 08 |
2.68 |
10 |
MONTGOMERY | 04 |
2.68 |
10 |
WASHINGTON | 03 |
2.68 |
10 |
HONOLULU | 09 |
2.68 |
14 |
ANCHORAGE AK | 10 |
2.62 |
15 |
MT PLEASANT MI | 05 |
2.61 |
16 |
PROVIDENCE | 01 |
2.59 |
17 |
SPRINGFIELD MA | 01 |
2.58 |
17 |
LEXINGTON | 04 |
2.58 |
19 |
MEMPHIS | 04 |
2.57 |
20 |
ST LOUIS | 07 |
2.56 |
20 |
FORT WORTH | 06 |
2.56 |
22 |
NEW YORK | 02 |
2.55 |
22 |
SPOKANE | 10 |
2.55 |
24 |
TUCSON | 09 |
2.54 |
25 |
HOUSTON NORTH | 06 |
2.53 |
26 |
PHILADELPHIA EAST | 03 |
2.52 |
26 |
LAWRENCE MA | 01 |
2.52 |
26 |
MIDDLESBORO | 04 |
2.52 |
29 |
FORT SMITH | 06 |
2.51 |
30 |
TULSA | 06 |
2.50 |
30 |
COLUMBIA SC | 04 |
2.50 |
30 |
SAN JUAN | 02 |
2.50 |
33 |
HARRISBURG | 03 |
2.49 |
34 |
RENO NV | 09 |
2.48 |
34 |
LONG BEACH | 09 |
2.48 |
36 |
RALEIGH | 04 |
2.47 |
37 |
HOUSTON-BISSONNET | 06 |
2.46 |
38 |
DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 06 |
2.45 |
38 |
DALLAS NORTH | 06 |
2.45 |
38 |
JOHNSTOWN | 03 |
2.45 |
41 |
RICHMOND | 03 |
2.44 |
41 |
CHATTANOOGA | 04 |
2.44 |
41 |
OMAHA | 07 |
2.44 |
44 |
MINNEAPOLIS | 05 |
2.43 |
44 |
GREENVILLE | 04 |
2.43 |
44 |
FRANKLIN TN | 04 |
2.43 |
44 |
MANCHESTER | 01 |
2.43 |
44 |
JERICHO | 02 |
2.43 |
49 |
AUGUSTA GA | 04 |
2.42 |
50 |
PORTLAND ME | 01 |
2.41 |
50 |
LANSING | 05 |
2.41 |
50 |
VALPARAISO IN | 05 |
2.41 |
50 |
LITTLE ROCK | 06 |
2.41 |
54 |
FT LAUDERDALE | 04 |
2.40 |
54 |
MOBILE | 04 |
2.40 |
54 |
PORTLAND OR | 10 |
2.40 |
57 |
TOLEDO OH | 05 |
2.39 |
57 |
CHARLESTON SC | 04 |
2.39 |
59 |
AKRON OH | 05 |
2.38 |
59 |
SAN BERNARDINO | 09 |
2.38 |
59 |
BRONX | 02 |
2.38 |
62 |
HARTFORD | 01 |
2.37 |
62 |
LOUISVILLE | 04 |
2.37 |
62 |
ATLANTA NORTH | 04 |
2.37 |
62 |
STOCKTON | 09 |
2.37 |
62 |
METAIRIE | 06 |
2.37 |
67 |
ALBUQUERQUE | 06 |
2.36 |
67 |
ALEXANDRIA | 06 |
2.36 |
67 |
BALTIMORE | 03 |
2.36 |
67 |
ORANGE | 09 |
2.36 |
71 |
SEVEN FIELDS | 03 |
2.35 |
71 |
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN | 04 |
2.35 |
71 |
ORLANDO | 04 |
2.35 |
74 |
CREVE COEUR | 07 |
2.34 |
74 |
MORENO VALLEY CA | 09 |
2.34 |
74 |
KNOXVILLE | 04 |
2.34 |
74 |
CHARLOTTE | 04 |
2.34 |
74 |
CHARLESTON WV | 03 |
2.34 |
74 |
BOSTON | 01 |
2.34 |
80 |
SAN ANTONIO | 06 |
2.33 |
81 |
FLINT | 05 |
2.32 |
81 |
NORFOLK | 03 |
2.32 |
83 |
GRAND RAPIDS | 05 |
2.31 |
83 |
JACKSON | 04 |
2.31 |
83 |
COLUMBIA MO | 07 |
2.31 |
86 |
HUNTINGTON | 03 |
2.30 |
86 |
MORGANTOWN | 03 |
2.30 |
88 |
ROCHESTER * | 02 |
2.29 |
88 |
ELKINS PARK | 03 |
2.29 |
88 |
ALBANY | 02 |
2.29 |
88 |
PITTSBURGH | 03 |
2.29 |
88 |
SACRAMENTO | 09 |
2.29 |
88 |
DENVER | 08 |
2.29 |
88 |
BILLINGS | 08 |
2.29 |
88 |
SAN JOSE | 09 |
2.29 |
96 |
WICHITA | 07 |
2.28 |
96 |
TOPEKA KS | 07 |
2.28 |
96 |
TUPELO | 04 |
2.28 |
96 |
NASHVILLE | 04 |
2.28 |
100 |
ST PETERSBURG FL | 04 |
2.26 |
100 |
LIVONIA MI | 05 |
2.26 |
100 |
FORT WAYNE | 05 |
2.26 |
103 |
OAK PARK | 05 |
2.25 |
103 |
FLORENCE | 04 |
2.25 |
103 |
NEW HAVEN | 01 |
2.25 |
103 |
SANTA BARBARA | 09 |
2.25 |
107 |
SAVANNAH | 04 |
2.23 |
108 |
DAYTON | 05 |
2.22 |
108 |
NEWARK | 02 |
2.22 |
110 |
BIRMINGHAM | 04 |
2.21 |
110 |
COVINGTON GA | 04 |
2.21 |
110 |
DETROIT | 05 |
2.21 |
113 |
SAN RAFAEL | 09 |
2.18 |
114 |
NEW ORLEANS | 06 |
2.16 |
114 |
JACKSONVILLE | 04 |
2.16 |
114 |
MAYAGUEZ | 02 |
2.16 |
117 |
PEORIA | 05 |
2.15 |
117 |
EVANSVILLE | 05 |
2.15 |
117 |
LAS VEGAS | 09 |
2.15 |
120 |
PHOENIX | 09 |
2.14 |
120 |
ROANOKE | 03 |
2.14 |
120 |
TAMPA | 04 |
2.14 |
123 |
MADISON | 05 |
2.12 |
123 |
LOS ANGELES WEST | 09 |
2.12 |
125 |
SHREVEPORT | 06 |
2.10 |
125 |
TALLAHASSEE FL | 04 |
2.10 |
125 |
FAYETTEVILLE NC | 04 |
2.10 |
125 |
SOUTH JERSEY | 02 |
2.10 |
129 |
DOVER | 03 |
2.09 |
129 |
SAN FRANCISCO | 09 |
2.09 |
129 |
PHOENIX NORTH | 09 |
2.09 |
129 |
GREENSBORO | 04 |
2.09 |
129 |
EUGENE | 10 |
2.09 |
134 |
OKLAHOMA CITY | 06 |
2.08 |
135 |
OAK BROOK | 05 |
2.07 |
136 |
INDIANAPOLIS | 05 |
2.06 |
137 |
TACOMA WA | 10 |
2.05 |
138 |
ORLAND PARK | 05 |
2.04 |
138 |
JERSEY CITY | 02 |
2.04 |
140 |
KANSAS CITY | 07 |
2.02 |
141 |
SALT LAKE CITY | 08 |
2.01 |
141 |
WEST DES MOINES | 07 |
2.01 |
141 |
SYRACUSE | 02 |
2.01 |
144 |
EVANSTON | 05 |
2.00 |
144 |
COLUMBUS | 05 |
2.00 |
144 |
SEATTLE | 10 |
2.00 |
147 |
FRESNO | 09 |
1.97 |
147 |
CHARLOTTESVILLE | 03 |
1.97 |
149 |
SPRINGFIELD MO | 07 |
1.96 |
150 |
MILWAUKEE | 05 |
1.95 |
150 |
WHITE PLAINS | 02 |
1.95 |
152 |
MACON | 04 |
1.94 |
153 |
CINCINNATI | 05 |
1.92 |
154 |
PHILADELPHIA | 03 |
1.91 |
155 |
BROOKLYN | 02 |
1.87 |
156 |
NORWALK | 09 |
1.86 |
157 |
PASADENA | 09 |
1.83 |
158 |
FORT MYERS FL * | 04 |
1.81 |
159 |
MIAMI | 04 |
1.78 |
160 |
OAKLAND | 09 |
1.73 |
161 |
CLEVELAND | 05 |
1.70 |
162 |
SAN DIEGO | 09 |
1.68 |
163 |
BUFFALO | 02 |
1.63 |
164 |
CHICAGO | 05 |
1.52 |
165 |
QUEENS | 02 |
1.51 |
Disclaimer: These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.
| |
Privacy Policy | Website
Policies & Other Important Information | Site
Map
Last reviewed or modified Friday Jun 14, 2013 |