| Skip to content Social Security Online |
Hearings and Appeals | |
| Archived Public Use Files | This is an archival or historical document and may not reflect current policies or procedures | |
Public Use Files |
||
Hearing Office Dispositions Per ALJ Per Day Rate Ranking ReportFY 2011 (For Reporting Purposes: 09/25/2010 Through 04/29/2011)A ranking of the 157 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of hearings dispositions per ALJ per day. The average shown will be a combined average for all ALJs working in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category. National Ranking Report
|
|
Rank
|
Hearing Office |
Region
|
ALJ Dispositions
Per Day Per ALJ |
|---|---|---|---|
1 |
PONCE | 02 |
4.76 |
2 |
HONOLULU | 09 |
3.76 |
3 |
SHREVEPORT | 06 |
3.72 |
4 |
MT PLEASANT MI | 05 |
3.60 |
5 |
TOLEDO OH | 05 |
3.32 |
6 |
ALEXANDRIA | 06 |
3.30 |
7 |
FORT MYERS FL * | 04 |
3.29 |
8 |
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX * | 06 |
3.21 |
9 |
FORT SMITH | 06 |
3.13 |
10 |
HUNTINGTON | 03 |
3.12 |
11 |
MCALESTER | 06 |
3.11 |
12 |
SAN BERNARDINO | 09 |
3.08 |
12 |
MAYAGUEZ | 02 |
3.08 |
14 |
BROOKLYN | 02 |
3.07 |
15 |
LITTLE ROCK | 06 |
3.01 |
16 |
AKRON OH | 05 |
2.96 |
16 |
ANCHORAGE AK | 10 |
2.96 |
18 |
CHARLESTON WV | 03 |
2.94 |
19 |
SEVEN FIELDS | 03 |
2.91 |
20 |
KINGSPORT | 04 |
2.87 |
21 |
WILKES BARRE | 03 |
2.84 |
21 |
METAIRIE | 06 |
2.84 |
23 |
TUCSON | 09 |
2.82 |
24 |
LANSING | 05 |
2.78 |
25 |
JACKSON | 04 |
2.76 |
26 |
MIDDLESBORO | 04 |
2.75 |
27 |
FORT WAYNE | 05 |
2.74 |
28 |
ORLAND PARK | 05 |
2.72 |
28 |
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN | 09 |
2.72 |
28 |
HARRISBURG | 03 |
2.72 |
28 |
LONG BEACH | 09 |
2.72 |
32 |
TULSA | 06 |
2.71 |
32 |
MEMPHIS | 04 |
2.71 |
34 |
FLINT | 05 |
2.70 |
34 |
COLORADO SPRINGS | 08 |
2.70 |
34 |
GREENVILLE | 04 |
2.70 |
37 |
LEXINGTON | 04 |
2.66 |
38 |
CHARLOTTE | 04 |
2.65 |
38 |
MINNEAPOLIS | 05 |
2.65 |
40 |
VALPARAISO IN | 05 |
2.63 |
40 |
PADUCAH | 04 |
2.63 |
42 |
PROVIDENCE | 01 |
2.62 |
43 |
CREVE COEUR | 07 |
2.61 |
43 |
FORT WORTH | 06 |
2.61 |
45 |
WEST DES MOINES | 07 |
2.59 |
46 |
TOPEKA KS | 07 |
2.58 |
47 |
COLUMBIA SC | 04 |
2.57 |
48 |
RALEIGH | 04 |
2.56 |
48 |
HARTFORD | 01 |
2.56 |
48 |
EVANSVILLE | 05 |
2.56 |
51 |
HATTIESBURG | 04 |
2.55 |
52 |
DALLAS DOWNTOWN | 06 |
2.54 |
53 |
LOS ANGELES WEST | 09 |
2.53 |
53 |
MORGANTOWN | 03 |
2.53 |
55 |
SAN JUAN | 02 |
2.52 |
55 |
MOBILE | 04 |
2.52 |
55 |
JOHNSTOWN | 03 |
2.52 |
58 |
FT LAUDERDALE | 04 |
2.51 |
59 |
MANCHESTER | 01 |
2.50 |
59 |
SALT LAKE CITY | 08 |
2.50 |
61 |
NASHVILLE | 04 |
2.49 |
61 |
DOVER | 03 |
2.49 |
63 |
ORANGE | 09 |
2.48 |
64 |
RICHMOND | 03 |
2.47 |
64 |
JERICHO | 02 |
2.47 |
64 |
NEW YORK | 02 |
2.47 |
64 |
LOUISVILLE | 04 |
2.47 |
68 |
SPOKANE | 10 |
2.46 |
69 |
ATLANTA NORTH | 04 |
2.45 |
69 |
SPRINGFIELD MA | 01 |
2.45 |
69 |
SAVANNAH | 04 |
2.45 |
69 |
ST LOUIS | 07 |
2.45 |
73 |
NEW HAVEN | 01 |
2.44 |
73 |
LAS VEGAS | 09 |
2.44 |
75 |
BOSTON | 01 |
2.43 |
75 |
WICHITA | 07 |
2.43 |
75 |
ORLANDO | 04 |
2.43 |
78 |
TUPELO | 04 |
2.42 |
78 |
SAN ANTONIO | 06 |
2.42 |
78 |
ALBUQUERQUE | 06 |
2.42 |
78 |
BIRMINGHAM | 04 |
2.42 |
78 |
MONTGOMERY | 04 |
2.42 |
78 |
MACON | 04 |
2.42 |
84 |
NEWARK | 02 |
2.41 |
85 |
PORTLAND ME | 01 |
2.40 |
85 |
NEW ORLEANS | 06 |
2.40 |
85 |
BILLINGS | 08 |
2.40 |
88 |
PHILADELPHIA EAST | 03 |
2.39 |
89 |
CHATTANOOGA | 04 |
2.38 |
89 |
STOCKTON | 09 |
2.38 |
89 |
SAN RAFAEL | 09 |
2.38 |
89 |
PORTLAND OR | 10 |
2.38 |
93 |
GRAND RAPIDS | 05 |
2.37 |
94 |
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN | 04 |
2.36 |
95 |
FAYETTEVILLE NC | 04 |
2.35 |
95 |
NORFOLK | 03 |
2.35 |
97 |
WASHINGTON | 03 |
2.34 |
98 |
CHARLOTTESVILLE | 03 |
2.33 |
98 |
HOUSTON-BISSONNET | 06 |
2.33 |
100 |
ROCHESTER * | 02 |
2.32 |
100 |
SACRAMENTO | 09 |
2.32 |
102 |
PITTSBURGH | 03 |
2.31 |
103 |
ALBANY | 02 |
2.30 |
104 |
BALTIMORE | 03 |
2.29 |
105 |
JACKSONVILLE | 04 |
2.28 |
105 |
SAN JOSE | 09 |
2.28 |
107 |
SAN FRANCISCO | 09 |
2.27 |
107 |
ELKINS PARK | 03 |
2.27 |
107 |
OAK PARK | 05 |
2.27 |
110 |
PHOENIX NORTH | 09 |
2.26 |
110 |
OMAHA | 07 |
2.26 |
110 |
EUGENE | 10 |
2.26 |
110 |
PASADENA | 09 |
2.26 |
114 |
SANTA BARBARA | 09 |
2.25 |
114 |
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN | 06 |
2.25 |
114 |
OKLAHOMA CITY | 06 |
2.25 |
117 |
PEORIA | 05 |
2.24 |
117 |
CHARLESTON SC | 04 |
2.24 |
119 |
SEATTLE | 10 |
2.23 |
120 |
LIVONIA MI | 05 |
2.21 |
120 |
KNOXVILLE | 04 |
2.21 |
122 |
EVANSTON | 05 |
2.20 |
123 |
CINCINNATI | 05 |
2.19 |
123 |
ROANOKE | 03 |
2.19 |
123 |
BRONX | 02 |
2.19 |
126 |
OAK BROOK | 05 |
2.17 |
127 |
GREENSBORO | 04 |
2.16 |
127 |
MADISON | 05 |
2.16 |
127 |
DETROIT | 05 |
2.16 |
127 |
DALLAS NORTH | 06 |
2.16 |
131 |
SYRACUSE | 02 |
2.14 |
132 |
CHICAGO | 05 |
2.12 |
132 |
DOWNEY | 09 |
2.12 |
134 |
FLORENCE | 04 |
2.11 |
135 |
TAMPA | 04 |
2.09 |
136 |
PHOENIX | 09 |
2.08 |
137 |
PHILADELPHIA | 03 |
2.07 |
137 |
INDIANAPOLIS | 05 |
2.07 |
137 |
COLUMBUS | 05 |
2.07 |
137 |
FARGO | 08 |
2.07 |
137 |
DENVER | 08 |
2.07 |
142 |
MILWAUKEE | 05 |
2.04 |
142 |
ST PETERSBURG FL | 04 |
2.04 |
142 |
WHITE PLAINS | 02 |
2.04 |
145 |
TALLAHASSEE FL | 04 |
2.03 |
146 |
COVINGTON GA | 04 |
1.97 |
146 |
SOUTH JERSEY | 02 |
1.97 |
146 |
FRESNO | 09 |
1.97 |
149 |
SPRINGFIELD MO | 07 |
1.92 |
150 |
MIAMI | 04 |
1.90 |
151 |
DAYTON | 05 |
1.88 |
152 |
SAN DIEGO | 09 |
1.80 |
153 |
KANSAS CITY | 07 |
1.76 |
154 |
QUEENS | 02 |
1.68 |
155 |
BUFFALO | 02 |
1.64 |
156 |
CLEVELAND | 05 |
1.63 |
157 |
OAKLAND | 09 |
1.61 |
Disclaimer: These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.
| |
Privacy Policy | Website Policies & Other Important Information | Site Map |