www.socialsecurity.gov| Skip to content Social Security Online |
Hearings and Appeals | |
| www.socialsecurity.gov |
| Archived Public Use Files | This is an archival or historical document and may not reflect current policies or procedures | |
Public Use Files |
||
Hearing Office Dispositions Per ALJ Per Day Rate Ranking ReportFY 2012 (For Reporting Purposes: 10/01/2011 Through 11/25/2011)A ranking of the 161 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of hearings dispositions per ALJ per day. The average shown will be a combined average for all ALJs working in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category. National Ranking Report
|
|
Rank
|
Hearing Office |
Region
|
ALJ Dispositions
Per Day Per ALJ |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
MAYAGUEZ |
02
|
4.40
|
|
2
|
ANCHORAGE AK |
10
|
4.00
|
|
3
|
HONOLULU |
09
|
3.89
|
|
4
|
FARGO |
08
|
3.86
|
|
5
|
PONCE |
02
|
3.80
|
|
6
|
ALEXANDRIA |
06
|
3.45
|
|
7
|
COLUMBIA MO |
07
|
3.37
|
|
8
|
FORT SMITH |
06
|
3.36
|
|
9
|
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX * |
06
|
3.33
|
|
10
|
KINGSPORT |
04
|
3.31
|
|
11
|
MEMPHIS |
04
|
3.23
|
|
12
|
CHARLESTON WV |
03
|
3.10
|
|
13
|
FORT MYERS FL * |
04
|
3.05
|
|
13
|
PROVIDENCE |
01
|
3.05
|
|
13
|
MT PLEASANT MI |
05
|
3.05
|
|
16
|
MCALESTER |
06
|
3.04
|
|
16
|
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN |
09
|
3.04
|
|
18
|
COLORADO SPRINGS |
08
|
3.03
|
|
19
|
LEXINGTON |
04
|
3.00
|
|
20
|
VALPARAISO IN |
05
|
2.99
|
|
21
|
GREENVILLE |
04
|
2.94
|
|
22
|
FAYETTEVILLE NC |
04
|
2.93
|
|
22
|
WILKES BARRE |
03
|
2.93
|
|
24
|
SHREVEPORT |
06
|
2.88
|
|
24
|
EUGENE |
10
|
2.88
|
|
26
|
FORT WORTH |
06
|
2.87
|
|
26
|
LAWRENCE MA |
01
|
2.87
|
|
28
|
LITTLE ROCK |
06
|
2.86
|
|
29
|
NEW YORK |
02
|
2.84
|
|
30
|
SAN BERNARDINO |
09
|
2.82
|
|
31
|
LONG BEACH |
09
|
2.80
|
|
32
|
SPRINGFIELD MA |
01
|
2.77
|
|
32
|
BILLINGS |
08
|
2.77
|
|
32
|
GRAND RAPIDS |
05
|
2.77
|
|
35
|
EVANSVILLE |
05
|
2.74
|
|
35
|
AKRON OH |
05
|
2.74
|
|
37
|
TOLEDO OH |
05
|
2.73
|
|
37
|
MACON |
04
|
2.73
|
|
39
|
STOCKTON |
09
|
2.72
|
|
39
|
TUCSON |
09
|
2.72
|
|
41
|
JOHNSTOWN |
03
|
2.70
|
|
42
|
FT LAUDERDALE |
04
|
2.69
|
|
42
|
LIVONIA MI |
05
|
2.69
|
|
44
|
JACKSON |
04
|
2.68
|
|
44
|
METAIRIE |
06
|
2.68
|
|
44
|
CHATTANOOGA |
04
|
2.68
|
|
44
|
PHILADELPHIA EAST |
03
|
2.68
|
|
44
|
MORGANTOWN |
03
|
2.68
|
|
49
|
RALEIGH |
04
|
2.67
|
|
49
|
HATTIESBURG |
04
|
2.67
|
|
49
|
RICHMOND |
03
|
2.67
|
|
49
|
SAN JOSE |
09
|
2.67
|
|
53
|
CHARLOTTE |
04
|
2.65
|
|
53
|
MADISON |
05
|
2.65
|
|
55
|
COLUMBIA SC |
04
|
2.63
|
|
55
|
SEVEN FIELDS |
03
|
2.63
|
|
55
|
SAN RAFAEL |
09
|
2.63
|
|
58
|
JERICHO |
02
|
2.62
|
|
58
|
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN |
06
|
2.62
|
|
60
|
NEW HAVEN |
01
|
2.61
|
|
61
|
COVINGTON GA |
04
|
2.60
|
|
62
|
TULSA |
06
|
2.59
|
|
63
|
LOS ANGELES WEST |
09
|
2.57
|
|
63
|
WEST DES MOINES |
07
|
2.57
|
|
63
|
OAK PARK |
05
|
2.57
|
|
63
|
BOSTON |
01
|
2.57
|
|
67
|
HARTFORD |
01
|
2.56
|
|
67
|
NORFOLK |
03
|
2.56
|
|
69
|
HOUSTON-BISSONNET |
06
|
2.55
|
|
70
|
FLORENCE |
04
|
2.54
|
|
71
|
LOUISVILLE |
04
|
2.52
|
|
71
|
PITTSBURGH |
03
|
2.52
|
|
71
|
NEWARK |
02
|
2.52
|
|
71
|
ELKINS PARK |
03
|
2.52
|
|
75
|
ROANOKE |
03
|
2.51
|
|
75
|
PORTLAND ME |
01
|
2.51
|
|
77
|
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN |
04
|
2.50
|
|
78
|
WICHITA |
07
|
2.49
|
|
78
|
MIDDLESBORO |
04
|
2.49
|
|
80
|
MANCHESTER |
01
|
2.48
|
|
81
|
ORLAND PARK |
05
|
2.47
|
|
81
|
SPOKANE |
10
|
2.47
|
|
83
|
ATLANTA NORTH |
04
|
2.46
|
|
84
|
NASHVILLE |
04
|
2.45
|
|
84
|
OMAHA |
07
|
2.45
|
|
84
|
DALLAS DOWNTOWN |
06
|
2.45
|
|
87
|
BRONX |
02
|
2.44
|
|
88
|
PADUCAH |
04
|
2.43
|
|
89
|
PORTLAND OR |
10
|
2.41
|
|
89
|
ORANGE |
09
|
2.41
|
|
91
|
SAN FRANCISCO |
09
|
2.39
|
|
91
|
SAN ANTONIO |
06
|
2.39
|
|
91
|
BROOKLYN |
02
|
2.39
|
|
91
|
SYRACUSE |
02
|
2.39
|
|
95
|
HUNTINGTON |
03
|
2.38
|
|
95
|
CHARLESTON SC |
04
|
2.38
|
|
95
|
SACRAMENTO |
09
|
2.38
|
|
98
|
DAYTON |
05
|
2.37
|
|
98
|
MOBILE |
04
|
2.37
|
|
100
|
MONTGOMERY |
04
|
2.36
|
|
100
|
FLINT |
05
|
2.36
|
|
100
|
PEORIA |
05
|
2.36
|
|
100
|
SALT LAKE CITY |
08
|
2.36
|
|
104
|
TUPELO |
04
|
2.35
|
|
104
|
BIRMINGHAM |
04
|
2.35
|
|
104
|
HARRISBURG |
03
|
2.35
|
|
104
|
SAN JUAN |
02
|
2.35
|
|
104
|
BALTIMORE |
03
|
2.35
|
|
109
|
MINNEAPOLIS |
05
|
2.34
|
|
110
|
TOPEKA KS |
07
|
2.32
|
|
111
|
DETROIT |
05
|
2.31
|
|
111
|
ROCHESTER * |
02
|
2.31
|
|
111
|
SOUTH JERSEY |
02
|
2.31
|
|
114
|
WASHINGTON |
03
|
2.30
|
|
114
|
PHOENIX |
09
|
2.30
|
|
116
|
KNOXVILLE |
04
|
2.29
|
|
117
|
JERSEY CITY |
02
|
2.28
|
|
117
|
CHARLOTTESVILLE |
03
|
2.28
|
|
119
|
FORT WAYNE |
05
|
2.27
|
|
120
|
DENVER |
08
|
2.26
|
|
120
|
OKLAHOMA CITY |
06
|
2.26
|
|
122
|
INDIANAPOLIS |
05
|
2.25
|
|
123
|
TACOMA WA |
10
|
2.23
|
|
124
|
MILWAUKEE |
05
|
2.22
|
|
125
|
SAVANNAH |
04
|
2.21
|
|
125
|
ALBANY |
02
|
2.21
|
|
127
|
ST PETERSBURG FL |
04
|
2.20
|
|
127
|
CREVE COEUR |
07
|
2.20
|
|
127
|
KANSAS CITY |
07
|
2.20
|
|
127
|
PHOENIX NORTH |
09
|
2.20
|
|
131
|
NEW ORLEANS |
06
|
2.19
|
|
131
|
DOVER |
03
|
2.19
|
|
133
|
OAK BROOK |
05
|
2.16
|
|
134
|
DALLAS NORTH |
06
|
2.15
|
|
134
|
ALBUQUERQUE |
06
|
2.15
|
|
134
|
FRESNO |
09
|
2.15
|
|
134
|
SEATTLE |
10
|
2.15
|
|
138
|
DOWNEY |
09
|
2.14
|
|
138
|
LANSING |
05
|
2.14
|
|
140
|
TAMPA |
04
|
2.13
|
|
140
|
SANTA BARBARA |
09
|
2.13
|
|
142
|
CLEVELAND |
05
|
2.11
|
|
143
|
GREENSBORO |
04
|
2.10
|
|
143
|
TALLAHASSEE FL |
04
|
2.10
|
|
145
|
LAS VEGAS |
09
|
2.09
|
|
146
|
EVANSTON |
05
|
2.06
|
|
147
|
WHITE PLAINS |
02
|
2.05
|
|
148
|
JACKSONVILLE |
04
|
2.00
|
|
148
|
ORLANDO |
04
|
2.00
|
|
150
|
PHILADELPHIA |
03
|
1.95
|
|
151
|
PASADENA |
09
|
1.94
|
|
152
|
SAN DIEGO |
09
|
1.87
|
|
152
|
ST LOUIS |
07
|
1.87
|
|
154
|
OAKLAND |
09
|
1.84
|
|
155
|
COLUMBUS |
05
|
1.79
|
|
156
|
CHICAGO |
05
|
1.78
|
|
157
|
CINCINNATI |
05
|
1.75
|
|
158
|
MIAMI |
04
|
1.74
|
|
159
|
BUFFALO |
02
|
1.70
|
|
160
|
SPRINGFIELD MO |
07
|
1.62
|
|
161
|
QUEENS |
02
|
1.21
|
Disclaimer: These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.
 |
Privacy Policy | Website Policies & Other Important Information | Site Map |