Hearing Office Average Processing Time Ranking Report
FY 2011 (For Reporting Purposes: 9/25/2010 Through 08/26/2011)

A ranking of the 157 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of days until final disposition of the hearing request. The average shown will be a combined average for all cases completed in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category.

National Ranking Report
By Average Processing Time
Fiscal YTD Ending: 08/26/2011
Workdays: 230

Rank Hearing Office Region Processing Time
1
PONCE
02
191
2
MAYAGUEZ
02
200
3
SHREVEPORT
06
209
4
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX *
06
232
5
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN
06
234
6
KINGSPORT
04
251
7
PADUCAH
04
263
8
MIDDLESBORO
04
271
9
FORT SMITH
06
273
10
CHARLOTTESVILLE
03
274
11
MCALESTER
06
276
12
NEW ORLEANS
06
279
13
CHATTANOOGA
04
280
14
HOUSTON-BISSONNET
06
281
15
ALEXANDRIA
06
282
15
COVINGTON GA
04
282
17
FORT WORTH
06
284
18
ELKINS PARK
03
289
19
SAN ANTONIO
06
290
20
BROOKLYN
02
292
21
NORFOLK
03
295
21
LIVONIA MI
05
295
21
VALPARAISO IN
05
295
24
DALLAS NORTH
06
297
25
HUNTINGTON
03
299
25
KNOXVILLE
04
299
27
LEXINGTON
04
300
27
ATLANTA NORTH
04
300
29
GREENVILLE
04
301
29
METAIRIE
06
301
31
LONG BEACH
09
302
32
DALLAS DOWNTOWN
06
303
32
CHARLOTTE
04
303
34
MADISON
05
306
35
HONOLULU
09
307
36
DOVER
03
313
37
CHARLESTON SC
04
315
38
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN
04
316
38
TOPEKA KS
07
316
40
CREVE COEUR
07
317
40
EVANSVILLE
05
317
42
RICHMOND
03
318
43
HARRISBURG
03
321
43
STOCKTON
09
321
43
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN
09
321
46
SPOKANE
10
322
47
HATTIESBURG
04
323
48
FAYETTEVILLE NC
04
326
49
EVANSTON
05
327
50
TUCSON
09
330
50
BOSTON
01
330
52
JACKSON
04
331
52
SAVANNAH
04
331
54
RALEIGH
04
332
55
SAN JUAN
02
333
56
ALBUQUERQUE
06
336
56
LOS ANGELES WEST
09
336
58
QUEENS
02
337
59
ALBANY
02
338
59
JERICHO
02
338
61
OAK PARK
05
339
62
WEST DES MOINES
07
341
63
LITTLE ROCK
06
342
64
SYRACUSE
02
343
65
CHARLESTON WV
03
344
66
OKLAHOMA CITY
06
346
66
ORANGE
09
346
68
TULSA
06
347
68
SOUTH JERSEY
02
347
70
PHILADELPHIA EAST
03
348
71
SAN BERNARDINO
09
349
72
ORLAND PARK
05
351
72
MILWAUKEE
05
351
72
JACKSONVILLE
04
351
75
AKRON OH
05
352
75
WICHITA
07
352
77
DETROIT
05
353
78
SACRAMENTO
09
355
78
COLUMBIA SC
04
355
78
MANCHESTER
01
355
78
SAN RAFAEL
09
355
82
MT PLEASANT MI
05
357
83
WILKES BARRE
03
358
83
TAMPA
04
358
85
DOWNEY
09
360
86
ORLANDO
04
361
87
MACON
04
362
88
PHILADELPHIA
03
364
89
PEORIA
05
366
90
BALTIMORE
03
367
91
PORTLAND ME
01
368
91
FT LAUDERDALE
04
368
91
PHOENIX NORTH
09
368
94
SEVEN FIELDS
03
369
95
SPRINGFIELD MA
01
373
96
PORTLAND OR
10
375
97
HARTFORD
01
378
98
FORT WAYNE
05
379
99
JOHNSTOWN
03
380
99
PASADENA
09
380
101
FLINT
05
382
102
LAS VEGAS
09
383
103
SANTA BARBARA
09
385
103
ANCHORAGE AK
10
385
105
DENVER
08
386
106
SALT LAKE CITY
08
387
106
WHITE PLAINS
02
387
108
ROCHESTER *
02
388
109
MORGANTOWN
03
389
109
TALLAHASSEE FL
04
389
111
NEW YORK
02
391
112
SEATTLE
10
392
113
FORT MYERS FL *
04
394
114
MEMPHIS
04
395
114
LOUISVILLE
04
395
116
SAN DIEGO
09
397
116
FARGO
08
397
118
SAN FRANCISCO
09
399
118
CHICAGO
05
399
120
PROVIDENCE
01
400
121
ST PETERSBURG FL
04
401
122
NASHVILLE
04
406
123
BILLINGS
08
408
124
MOBILE
04
409
125
MINNEAPOLIS
05
410
126
CINCINNATI
05
414
127
SAN JOSE
09
416
128
MONTGOMERY
04
417
129
MIAMI
04
420
129
NEWARK
02
420
131
WASHINGTON
03
421
132
TUPELO
04
422
133
FRESNO
09
424
133
NEW HAVEN
01
424
135
COLORADO SPRINGS
08
425
135
KANSAS CITY
07
425
137
BRONX
02
429
138
FLORENCE
04
431
139
ROANOKE
03
435
140
ST LOUIS
07
436
141
OMAHA
07
437
142
OAKLAND
09
439
143
OAK BROOK
05
440
144
LANSING
05
441
144
BIRMINGHAM
04
441
146
GREENSBORO
04
442
147
PHOENIX
09
444
148
PITTSBURGH
03
451
148
EUGENE
10
451
150
TOLEDO OH
05
465
151
INDIANAPOLIS
05
476
152
SPRINGFIELD MO
07
484
153
GRAND RAPIDS
05
486
154
COLUMBUS
05
491
154
CLEVELAND
05
491
156
BUFFALO
02
495
157
DAYTON
05
499

* Satellite Offices reported separately from their parent office.

 

Disclaimer

These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.