Hearing Office Average Processing Time Ranking Report
FY 2011 (For Reporting Purposes: 9/25/2010 Through 02/25/2011)

A ranking of the 157 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of days until final disposition of the hearing request. The average shown will be a combined average for all cases completed in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category.

National Ranking Report
By Average Processing Time
Fiscal YTD Ending: 02/25/2011
Workdays: 102

Rank Hearing Office Region Processing Time
1
MAYAGUEZ
02
177
2
PONCE
02
183
2
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX *
06
183
4
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN
06
245
5
SHREVEPORT
06
249
6
FAYETTEVILLE NC
04
257
7
KINGSPORT
04
261
8
HUNTINGTON
03
262
9
BROOKLYN
02
268
10
MIDDLESBORO
04
274
10
MCALESTER
06
274
12
LIVONIA MI
05
275
12
COVINGTON GA
04
275
14
PADUCAH
04
276
15
FORT WORTH
06
277
16
ELKINS PARK
03
283
17
FORT SMITH
06
286
17
ALEXANDRIA
06
286
19
SAN ANTONIO
06
288
20
NORFOLK
03
290
21
METAIRIE
06
295
22
DALLAS NORTH
06
297
23
DOVER
03
299
24
CREVE COEUR
07
300
25
CHARLOTTESVILLE
03
301
25
KNOXVILLE
04
301
27
VALPARAISO IN
05
302
28
ATLANTA NORTH
04
307
28
RICHMOND
03
307
28
HOUSTON-BISSONNET
06
307
31
CHATTANOOGA
04
308
32
CHARLOTTE
04
309
32
DALLAS DOWNTOWN
06
309
34
TOPEKA KS
07
310
35
NEW ORLEANS
06
311
36
EVANSTON
05
312
36
GREENVILLE
04
312
38
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN
04
313
39
MADISON
05
314
40
EVANSVILLE
05
315
41
SAN JUAN
02
317
42
WEST DES MOINES
07
318
43
AKRON OH
05
319
44
SAVANNAH
04
324
44
LEXINGTON
04
324
46
HARRISBURG
03
325
47
HONOLULU
09
327
48
QUEENS
02
328
49
HATTIESBURG
04
330
49
CHARLESTON SC
04
330
49
WICHITA
07
330
52
LONG BEACH
09
332
52
ALBUQUERQUE
06
332
54
OKLAHOMA CITY
06
334
55
SPOKANE
10
336
55
BOSTON
01
336
57
STOCKTON
09
339
58
LOS ANGELES WEST
09
341
58
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN
09
341
58
SOUTH JERSEY
02
341
61
SYRACUSE
02
348
62
PORTLAND ME
01
349
63
JERICHO
02
350
63
CHARLESTON WV
03
350
65
PHILADELPHIA EAST
03
351
65
SAN BERNARDINO
09
351
65
LITTLE ROCK
06
351
68
ALBANY
02
353
68
PHILADELPHIA
03
353
68
RALEIGH
04
353
71
MACON
04
355
72
NEW YORK
02
357
73
WILKES BARRE
03
361
74
JACKSON
04
363
74
TULSA
06
363
76
TUCSON
09
365
76
JACKSONVILLE
04
365
78
ORANGE
09
368
79
SEVEN FIELDS
03
369
80
DETROIT
05
370
80
MANCHESTER
01
370
82
FT LAUDERDALE
04
371
82
DOWNEY
09
371
84
SACRAMENTO
09
372
85
ROCHESTER *
02
376
86
BALTIMORE
03
377
87
TAMPA
04
380
88
PHOENIX NORTH
09
382
88
HARTFORD
01
382
88
SPRINGFIELD MA
01
382
91
SANTA BARBARA
09
384
92
SAN DIEGO
09
385
92
MILWAUKEE
05
385
94
ORLAND PARK
05
386
94
PORTLAND OR
10
386
94
PEORIA
05
386
97
COLUMBIA SC
04
388
97
FLINT
05
388
99
SAN FRANCISCO
09
390
100
PASADENA
09
391
101
MORGANTOWN
03
393
102
FORT MYERS FL *
04
394
103
SEATTLE
10
396
104
WHITE PLAINS
02
398
105
ST PETERSBURG FL
04
400
106
JOHNSTOWN
03
401
107
ORLANDO
04
402
108
SALT LAKE CITY
08
403
109
DENVER
08
404
110
LAS VEGAS
09
406
111
TALLAHASSE FL
04
407
112
OAK PARK
05
408
113
SAN JOSE
09
410
114
NASHVILLE
04
411
115
MEMPHIS
04
412
115
FARGO
08
412
117
GREENSBORO
04
414
117
KANSAS CITY
07
414
119
PROVIDENCE
01
415
120
MOBILE
04
417
121
OAK BROOK
05
418
122
LOUISVILLE
04
419
123
COLORADO SPRINGS
08
421
124
MT PLEASANT MI
05
423
125
FORT WAYNE
05
424
125
CINCINNATI
05
424
127
CHICAGO
05
425
127
BILLINGS
08
425
129
MONTGOMERY
04
428
130
TUPELO
04
433
131
FLORENCE
04
436
131
FRESNO
09
436
133
SAN RAFAEL
09
438
133
MINNEAPOLIS
05
438
135
MIAMI
04
439
136
BIRMINGHAM
04
442
137
NEW HAVEN
01
444
138
ST LOUIS
07
445
138
OAKLAND
09
445
140
WASHINGTON
03
448
140
BRONX
02
448
142
NEWARK
02
449
143
OMAHA
07
450
144
TOLEDO OH
05
451
145
EUGENE
10
452
146
ROANOKE
03
453
147
PITTSBURGH
03
462
148
SPRINGFIELD MO
07
465
149
ANCHORAGE AK
10
467
150
PHOENIX
09
473
151
GRAND RAPIDS
05
477
152
DAYTON
05
484
153
BUFFALO
02
511
154
CLEVELAND
05
515
155
INDIANAPOLIS
05
524
156
COLUMBUS
05
539
157
LANSING
05
545

* Satellite Offices reported separately from their parent office.

 

Disclaimer

These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.