Hearing Office Average Processing Time Ranking Report
FY 2011 (For Reporting Purposes: 9/25/2010 Through 06/24/2011)

A ranking of the 157 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of days until final disposition of the hearing request. The average shown will be a combined average for all cases completed in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category.

National Ranking Report
By Average Processing Time
Fiscal YTD Ending: 06/24/2011
Workdays: 186

Rank Hearing Office Region Processing Time
1
MAYAGUEZ
02
188
1
PONCE
02
188
3
SHREVEPORT
06
218
4
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN
06
236
5
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX *
06
241
6
KINGSPORT
04
258
7
PADUCAH
04
265
8
MIDDLESBORO
04
272
9
FORT SMITH
06
276
10
COVINGTON GA
04
277
11
MCALESTER
06
278
12
CHARLOTTESVILLE
03
280
13
ALEXANDRIA
06
282
14
FORT WORTH
06
284
15
HOUSTON-BISSONNET
06
285
15
NEW ORLEANS
06
285
17
ELKINS PARK
03
286
17
BROOKLYN
02
286
19
CHATTANOOGA
04
287
20
HUNTINGTON
03
289
21
SAN ANTONIO
06
291
22
DALLAS NORTH
06
293
22
LIVONIA MI
05
293
24
NORFOLK
03
294
25
VALPARAISO IN
05
297
26
KNOXVILLE
04
298
26
ATLANTA NORTH
04
298
28
METAIRIE
06
300
29
DALLAS DOWNTOWN
06
301
30
CHARLOTTE
04
302
31
GREENVILLE
04
306
32
DOVER
03
307
32
LONG BEACH
09
307
34
RICHMOND
03
310
34
LEXINGTON
04
310
36
EVANSVILLE
05
311
37
CREVE COEUR
07
312
37
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN
04
312
37
HONOLULU
09
312
40
FAYETTEVILLE NC
04
314
40
MADISON
05
314
42
EVANSTON
05
318
43
TOPEKA KS
07
320
44
HARRISBURG
03
321
44
CHARLESTON SC
04
321
46
HATTIESBURG
04
325
47
SPOKANE
10
327
48
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN
09
329
49
STOCKTON
09
330
49
BOSTON
01
330
51
ALBUQUERQUE
06
331
51
SAVANNAH
04
331
53
QUEENS
02
335
54
SAN JUAN
02
336
54
WEST DES MOINES
07
336
56
RALEIGH
04
337
57
ALBANY
02
338
58
LOS ANGELES WEST
09
341
58
TUCSON
09
341
60
OKLAHOMA CITY
06
342
60
JACKSON
04
342
62
SOUTH JERSEY
02
343
63
SYRACUSE
02
344
63
JERICHO
02
344
63
LITTLE ROCK
06
344
66
AKRON OH
05
345
67
CHARLESTON WV
03
346
68
SAN BERNARDINO
09
348
68
WICHITA
07
348
70
TULSA
06
350
70
PHILADELPHIA EAST
03
350
72
ORANGE
09
353
73
JACKSONVILLE
04
355
73
OAK PARK
05
355
75
MILWAUKEE
05
357
75
SACRAMENTO
09
357
75
COLUMBIA SC
04
357
78
WILKES BARRE
03
358
79
MANCHESTER
01
359
79
MACON
04
359
79
DETROIT
05
359
82
PORTLAND ME
01
361
82
DOWNEY
09
361
84
PHILADELPHIA
03
362
84
ORLAND PARK
05
362
86
TAMPA
04
366
86
BALTIMORE
03
366
88
FT LAUDERDALE
04
369
88
MT PLEASANT MI
05
369
90
PHOENIX NORTH
09
371
91
PEORIA
05
373
91
ORLANDO
04
373
91
ROCHESTER *
02
373
94
SAN RAFAEL
09
374
94
PORTLAND OR
10
374
96
SEVEN FIELDS
03
375
97
SPRINGFIELD MA
01
377
98
HARTFORD
01
379
99
JOHNSTOWN
03
384
100
MORGANTOWN
03
385
100
PASADENA
09
385
102
NEW YORK
02
387
103
TALLAHASSEE FL
04
388
103
SANTA BARBARA
09
388
105
FORT WAYNE
05
389
105
FLINT
05
389
107
DENVER
08
392
107
SALT LAKE CITY
08
392
107
SEATTLE
10
392
110
SAN DIEGO
09
393
111
WHITE PLAINS
02
394
112
SAN FRANCISCO
09
395
113
LAS VEGAS
09
396
114
FORT MYERS FL *
04
398
115
MEMPHIS
04
401
115
LOUISVILLE
04
401
117
PROVIDENCE
01
403
118
ST PETERSBURG FL
04
404
118
FARGO
08
404
118
CHICAGO
05
404
121
NASHVILLE
04
407
122
BILLINGS
08
411
123
MOBILE
04
413
124
ANCHORAGE AK
10
414
124
SAN JOSE
09
414
126
MINNEAPOLIS
05
416
127
KANSAS CITY
07
419
128
MONTGOMERY
04
420
129
COLORADO SPRINGS
08
421
129
CINCINNATI
05
421
131
FRESNO
09
426
131
NEWARK
02
426
133
MIAMI
04
427
133
TUPELO
04
427
135
NEW HAVEN
01
428
136
WASHINGTON
03
430
137
FLORENCE
04
434
137
OAK BROOK
05
434
139
ST LOUIS
07
435
140
BRONX
02
436
141
ROANOKE
03
437
141
GREENSBORO
04
437
143
OMAHA
07
438
144
BIRMINGHAM
04
442
144
OAKLAND
09
442
146
EUGENE
10
453
147
PITTSBURGH
03
456
148
PHOENIX
09
458
149
TOLEDO OH
05
465
150
LANSING
05
474
150
SPRINGFIELD MO
07
474
152
GRAND RAPIDS
05
484
153
INDIANAPOLIS
05
487
154
DAYTON
05
499
154
BUFFALO
02
499
156
CLEVELAND
05
504
157
COLUMBUS
05
510

* Satellite Offices reported separately from their parent office.

 

Disclaimer

These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.