Last Update: 9/08/05 (Transmittal I-3-36)
The analyst will review the ALJ's action and the evidence of record, and may review non-exhibit documents in the claim file to determine whether any documents contain additional relevant evidence. The analyst must also review any contentions and additional evidence submitted in connection with the request for review.
There appears to be an abuse of discretion by the ALJ;
There is an error of law;
The action, findings or conclusions of the ALJ are not supported by substantial evidence;
New and material evidence, which relates to the period on or before the date of the ALJ's decision, is submitted and the ALJ's action, findings or conclusion is contrary to the weight of the evidence currently of record; or
There is a broad policy or procedural issue that may affect the general public interest.