The future income and cost of the OASDI program will depend on many demographic, economic, and program-specific factors. Trust fund income will depend on how these factors affect the size and composition of the working population as well as the level and distribution of earnings. Similarly, program cost will depend on how these factors affect the size and composition of the beneficiary population as well as the general level of benefits.The Trustees make basic assumptions for several of these factors based on analysis of historical trends, historical conditions, and expected future conditions. These factors include fertility, mortality, immigration, marriage, divorce, productivity, inflation, average earnings, unemployment, real interest rate, and disability incidence and termination. Other factors depend on these basic assumptions. These other, often interdependent, factors include total population, life expectancy, labor force participation, gross domestic product, and program-specific factors. Each year the Trustees reexamine these assumptions and methods in light of new information and make appropriate revisions. The Trustees selected the assumptions for this report by the end of January 2014.Future levels of these factors and their interrelationships are inherently uncertain. To address these uncertainties, this report uses three sets of assumptions, designated as intermediate (alternative II), low-cost (alternative I), and high-cost (alternative III). The intermediate set represents the Trustees’ best estimate of the future course of the population and the economy. With regard to the net effect on the actuarial status of the OASDI program, the low-cost set is more optimistic and the high-cost set is more pessimistic. The low-cost and high-cost sets of assumptions reflect significant potential changes in the interrelationships among factors, as well as changes in the values for individual factors.While it is unlikely that all of the factors and interactions will differ in the specified directions from the intermediate values, many combinations of individual differences in the factors could have a similar overall effect. Outcomes with overall long-range cost as low as the low-cost scenario or as high as the high-cost scenario are very unlikely. This report also includes sensitivity analysis, where factors are changed one at a time (see appendix D), and a stochastic projection, which provides a probability distribution of possible future outcomes that is centered around the intermediate assumptions (see appendix E).The following sections briefly discuss the various assumptions and methods required to make the estimates of trust fund financial status, which are the heart of this report.1 There are, of course, many interrelationships among these factors that make a sequential presentation potentially misleading.A. DEMOGRAPHIC ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODSTable V.A1 displays the principal demographic assumptions relating to fertility, mortality, and net immigration for the three alternatives.Historically, birth rates in the United States have fluctuated widely. The total fertility rate2 decreased from 3.31 children per woman at the end of World War I (1918) to 2.15 during the Great Depression (1936). After 1936, the total fertility rate rose to 3.68 in 1957 and then fell to 1.74 by 1976. After 1976, the total fertility rate began to rise again until it reached a level of 2.07 for 1990. From 1991 to 2006, the total fertility rate averaged 2.03 children per woman. Then, the total fertility rate dropped from 2.12 in 2007 to 1.89 in 2011 and, based on preliminary data, to 1.88 in 2012. The recession and high unemployment are likely reasons for this drop. The estimated total fertility rate for 2013 is 1.89.The Office of the Chief Actuary calculated historical death rates for years 1900‑2010 for ages below 65 (and for all ages for years prior to 1968) using data from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).3 For ages 65 and over, the office used final Medicare data on deaths and enrollments for years 1968 through 2010 and preliminary data for 2011. The office produced death rates by cause of death at all ages for years 1979‑2010 using data from the NCHS.The total age-sex-adjusted death rate4 declined at an average annual rate of 1.07 percent between 1900 and 2010. Between 1979 and 2010, the period for which death rates were analyzed by cause, the total age-sex-adjusted death rate, for all causes combined, declined at an average rate of 0.99 percent per year.Table V.A1 contains historical and projected age-sex-adjusted death rates for the total population (all ages), for ages under 65, and for ages 65 and over. Age-sex adjustment eliminates the effect of a changing distribution of population by age and sex, allowing the pure effects of changes in death rates to be observed. The level of these age-sex-adjusted death rates is substantially higher than the level shown for the age-sex-adjusted death rates in last year’s report due to the change in the “standard” population used for age-sex adjusting. For last year’s report, this standard population was the enumerated resident population as of April 1, 2000. For this year’s report, the standard population is the enumerated resident population as of April 1, 2010. This change in the standard population for age-sex adjusting has very little effect on the rates of improvement. If there had been no change in the standard population used for age-sex adjusting, then the level of projected age-sex-adjusted death rates would be similar to the level shown in last year’s report.Legal immigration increased after World War II to around 300,000 persons per year and remained around that level until shortly after 1960. With the Immigration Act of 1965 and other related changes, annual legal immigration increased to about 400,000 and remained fairly stable until 1977. Between 1977 and 1990, legal immigration once again increased, averaging about 580,0005 per year.The Immigration Act of 1990, which took effect in fiscal year 1992, restructured the immigration categories and increased significantly the number of immigrants who may legally enter the United States. Legal immigration averaged about 780,0001 persons per year during the period 1992 through 1999. Legal immigration increased to about 895,000 in 2000 and about 1,060,000 in 2001, primarily due to an increase in the number of persons granted legal permanent resident status as immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, the only category of legal immigration that is not numerically limited. However, legal immigration declined to less than 770,000 by 2003 as processing slowed and the number of pending applications increased. From 2003 to 2006, processing accelerated and legal immigration increased until it reached about 1,215,000 in 2006. For 2007 through 2009, legal immigration decreased to about 1,110,000 and declined further to about 1,045,000 in 2010, 1,055,000 in 2011, and 1,030,000 in 2012. The estimated level of legal immigration in 2013 is 1,050,000.
Legal e Other f 2012 g
Historical estimates of net legal immigration assume a 25 percent reduction in legal immigration due to legal emigration.
4. Total Population EstimatesThis report presents a July 1 (i.e., midyear) population for each year, which is derived from surrounding January populations. Table V.A2 shows the historical and projected population for July 1 by broad age group, for the three alternatives. It also shows the aged and total dependency ratios (see table footnotes for definitions).
Aged a Total b 2013 c
• Cohort life expectancy does not use death rates for a single year, but for the series of years in which the individual will actually reach each succeeding age if he or she survives. Cohort life expectancy provides an individual’s expected average remaining lifetime at a selected age in a given year, using actual or expected future changes in death rates. Table V.A4 presents historical and projected life expectancy calculated on a cohort basis. Cohort life expectancy is somewhat greater than period life expectancy for a given year because: (a) death rates at any age tend to decline over time; and (b) cohort life expectancy uses death rates from future years, while period life expectancy uses death rates only from the given year.Life expectancy at a given age reflects death rates at that and all older ages. Period life expectancy is somewhat related to the age-sex-adjusted death rate discussed in section V.A.2. However, life expectancy places far greater weight on death rates at lower ages than at higher ages. Therefore, changes in death rates at lower ages have far greater effects in changing life expectancy over time. It is important to keep this concept in mind when considering trends in life expectancy.
Table V.A3.—Period Life Expectancy a 2013 b
Table V.A4.—Cohort Life Expectancy a At birth b At age 65 c
Actuarial Studies published by the Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security Administration, contain further details about the assumptions, methods, and actuarial estimates. A complete list of available studies may be found at www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/NOTES/actstud.html. To obtain copies of such studies or of this report, please submit a request at www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/request.html or write to: Office of the Chief Actuary, 700 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235. This entire report, along with supplemental year-by-year tables, may also be found at
www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/TR/2014/index.html.
SSA Home | Privacy Policy | Website Policies & Other Important Information | Site Map | Actuarial Publications | July 28, 2014 |